Skip to main content

Photo: “DSC04144“, by Luigino Bracci licensed under CC BY 2.0. Hue modified from the original

Kramarz, Teresa, and Donald Kingsbury. “The Limits of Populism as Causal Explanation.” In Populist Moments and Extractivist States in Venezuela and Ecuador, 13–31. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2021.

Abstract

This chapter introduces Latin American populism in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. In the first section we examine economic, political, and critical approaches to populism’s relationship with liberal democracy, a common concern throughout the literature on the topic. These approaches, we argue, explicitly or implicitly carry a teleological and ultimately Eurocentric bias of “democratization” that understands populism as a pathological condition of underdeveloped peoples and places. Among other problematic attributes, these accounts miss the interdependencies between populism and extractivist state formations. Extractivist states, we argue, better explain the sort of democratic accountability gaps that engender populist reactions. In the second section, we explore in greater detail how ostensibly populist sequences relate to political and ecological accountability. The chapter concludes with a call for rethinking populism along several dimensions and as nested within the broader context of extractivism.

illiberalism.org

The Illiberalism Studies Program studies the different faces of illiberal politics and thought in today’s world, taking into account the diversity of their cultural context, their intellectual genealogy, the sociology of their popular support, and their implications on the international scene.